Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinemore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I'm afraid I have go give more weight to arguments based on Wikipedia's notability guidelines than editors' individual opinions about notability. Hut 8.5 21:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dinemore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to identify any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources; given the tiny number of locations, this is not surprising. —swpb^T 12:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 12:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 12:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not noteworthy for a stand alone article, more of a local promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 13:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm still not finding anything actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep for a business that was the first and is currently the largest Sri Lankan-based fast food franchise, it is a shame that it is so difficult to find reliable independent secondary sources. I believe that the business is notable however accept that there is a lack of significant coverage of the business. Dan arndt (talk) 08:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Dan arndt: Without significant coverage in RS, we cannot keep the page. It's that simple. Your "belief" in notability carries zero weight. —swpb^T 13:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.